Differential attainment

Differential attainment

Read the executive summary and download the full Chasing Equality in Pharmacy Training report on differential attainment in pharmacy education.

Published: 11 January 2024

This was published when the organisation was the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.


Executive summary


This collaborative report describes how to close the differential degree awarding gap and registration assessment attainment for Black trainees in initial pharmacy education and training.

1. What is a differential degree awarding gap and a differential registration assessment attainment gap?

This report explores both the differential degree awarding gap (formerly known as the ’attainment gap’) and the differential registration attainment gap at the pharmacist foundation training registration assessment. In higher education, the degree differential awarding gap is the difference in the proportion of two student groups receiving a first or second-class degree.

There are significant gaps for student groups who share a protected characteristic in most higher education institutions1.

The registration assessment differential attainment gap is the difference in the proportion of two student groups who pass the pharmacist registration assessment at their first sitting.

2. Sizing the gap
  • Based on Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) data, an awarding gap in the Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) degree has been reported2.
  • In 2017/2018 and 2018/2019, 91% of White students were awarded first class or upper second-class honours, compared with 79% of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic students.
  • In 2019/2020 and 2020/21, 94% of White graduates were awarded a first or upper second-class degree, compared with 86% of ethnic minority graduates. The degree awarding gap has narrowed to 8%.
  • In 2019/2020 and 2020/21, a 12% degree awarding gap has been recorded for those of Black ethnicity compared with White students.
  • A variation in the registration assessment pass rate for first time sitters between Black or Black British: African trainees compared to White: British trainees of 39% was first reported by the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) in 2013.
  • The GPhC undertook a qualitative evaluation of the causes, which was published in 20163.
  • Our research shows that an attainment gap persists a decade since it was first reported. Data suggests that the 2023 attainment gap Black or Black British: African and White: British trainees for first time sitters in the pharmacist foundation registration assessment is 23%.
  • While some notable progress has been made in some areas across the system, the degree awarding and registration assessment attainment gaps persist, and more action is needed today to make a change for the future.

3. Contributing factors

A system level approach is required to address the complex and multifaceted elements of the gap. These can be separated into:

  1. Individual factors – helping students to challenge expectations about themselves and valuing the wealth of experience and cultural understanding they can bring due to their diversity.
  2. Institutional cultures and organisational structures – addressing negative institutional cultures, organisational structures, and leadership where present to provide a vision and strategy for inclusion within their organisations.
4. How can we close the gap?

Across the research literature in medical education4, and within the qualitative work undertaken by the GPhC3, a series of changes can be made from an organisational perspective to reduce the current degree awarding gap and registration assessment differential attainment gap including:

  • Monitoring data.
  • Mentoring, role models and supportive networks.
  • Improving cultural competence for tutors.
  • Recognising and celebrating diversity.
  • Regulation and quality assurance.
  • Protected learning time.
5. Future actions and key areas of focus

The path to resolving the differential degree awarding and registration assessment attainment gaps relies on advocacy and support from across different parts of the system and organisation in the journey to registration.

Collective action is required as a profession, as it is now over a decade since differential attainment in pharmacy was first recognised3. The Royal College of Pharmacy (RCPharm) has formed a working group with representatives from the British Pharmaceutical Students Association, General Pharmaceutical Council, NHS England’s CPhO Office, WT&E Team and IPP Advisory Board, Pharmacy Schools Council, RCPharm, and individuals representing Schools of Pharmacy.

The aim of the group is to address the challenges and to make positive strides in reducing the differential degree awarding and registration assessment attainment gaps. This working will feed into the NHS IPP Advisory Board.

This report brings together the knowledge and data of the current differential degree awarding and registration attainment gaps, analyses the progress that has been made to date, and recommends further steps to be taken.

The key areas of focus are:

  • Improving data collection, analysis and data sharing.
  • Inspiring current and prospective students, supporting their aspirations with practical help and promoting the benefit of positive role models.
  • Removing bias from processes.
  • Providing support during the transition from pharmacy student to foundation training placements.
  • Additionally, we emphasise the importance of tutor training, the implementation of protected learning time in foundation trainee programmes, and an annual equality, diversity and inclusion forum to ensure good practice is being shared across Schools of Pharmacy and training placements.
6. Recommendations

Since 2013, there has been a recorded difference in degrees awarded and registration assessment pass rate attained by Black students and trainees.

These gaps must be addressed with positive action taken to ensure they are removed, to ensure that Black students and trainees can achieve the standards required for pharmacist registration, regardless of their backgrounds. This will also benefit patient care.

Ultimately, by creating a better experience for Black pharmacy students and foundation trainees, we can raise the quality for all students, and in turn all patients and the public. We also want to see a more open and inclusive culture for overseas pharmacy students.

As a working group we are dedicated and committed to work together to take forward the actions highlighted in this report, to ensure there is meaningful and sustainable change in reducing and removing the degree awarding gap and registration assessment attainment gap for Black students and trainees

The reasons for a differential degree awarding gap and registration assessment attainment gap for Black students and trainees are multifactorial, thus, an intersectional and a system-wide approach is required. The profession needs to ensure they are doing their part to address differential gaps and improve the Black student and trainee experience.

The actions highlighted in this report are not only for the working group to take forward; they require the whole profession to take action in their working environments to ensure Black students and trainees have a positive experience free from prejudice and discrimination and are offered opportunities to reach their full potential and thrive in pharmacy.

The following recommendations and outputs have been made for both the working group and for the wider profession:

  1. Working group to primarily focus on addressing the differential degree awarding gap and registration assessment attainment gap for Black students and trainees, taking an intersectional approach to be taken. Targets and timelines will need to be set.

2. Schools of Pharmacy, foundation training providers, and educational training providers to take forward the actions, as highlighted in this report, to make meaningful and positive changes in their own areas. Areas can form their own working groups to take meaningful steps to address the differential awarding and registration assessment attainment gaps for their students and trainees.

3. Smaller task and finish groups led by members of the working group to focus on the key themes and areas highlighted and take forward the actions outlined. The task and finish groups will be formed by members of the profession with relevant experience to support in moving actions forward. Targets and timelines will be set to ensure actions are moving forward to reduce the differential gaps.

4. Working group to meet every six months to review the progress of each organisation and task and finish group. This will help to ensure the differential awarding and attainment gap is reducing. Progress will be reported to the IPP advisory board to ensure accountability and to demonstrate progress in narrowing the degree awarding gap and registration differential attainment gap. Progress will also be reported annually at the EDI forum.

5. Organisations continue to advocate and lobby to ensure all foundation trainees to receive regular protected learning time within their working day.

6. Working group to review differential awarding gaps and registration assessment attainment gaps for other protected characteristics as part of their future remit to ensure pharmacy students and foundation trainees are not disadvantaged based on their protected characteristics.

In addition to the recommendations summarised here, there are a series of organisational actions for delivery to help bring these recommendations to reality.

Supported by:

  • British Pharmaceutical Students Association (BPSA)
  • Chief Pharmaceutical Officer for England
  • Chair of the Inclusive Pharmacy Practice Advisory Board
  • General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)
  • Pharmacy Schools Council (PhSC)
  • Royal College of Pharmacy (RCPharm)
  • And additional Schools of Pharmacy

Read more about our work on differential attainment.

Executive summary references

https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/Reports/closing-the-gap-three-years-on.pdf

https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/feature/infographic-the-ethnicity-awarding-gap-for-the-pharmacy-degree-during-covid-19

3 https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/qual-research-into-ra-performance-among-black-african_candidates_final_1.pdf (no longer available)

https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-differential-attainment-final-report-13_08_18-76652679.pdf